The Journal of
WORLD INVESTMENT & TRADE
Volume 8
June 2007
Number 3
ABSTRACTS
Kaj Hobér: The
Energy Charter TreatyAn
Overview
The article provides a general overview of the multilateral energy cooperation created by
the Treaty (e.g. trade, transit, energy efficiency and dispute resolution), as well as a
more detailed account of the Treatys investment protection regime and provisions on
settlement of investor-State disputes.
Kaj Hobér is a Partner with Mannheimer
Swartling Advokatbyrĺ in Stockholm, Sweden and Professor of East European
Commercial Law at Uppsala University.
Andrew Newcombe: Sustainable Development and Investment
Treaty Law
Critics of
international investment agreements (Iias)
argue that the Iia regime threatens
sustainable development. This paper
evaluates the Iia regime against the New
Delhi Declaration's seven principles of international law relating to sustainable development and concludes that the Iia regime is not a
serious impediment to sustainable development. Recent
treaty practice and investment treaty jurisprudence integrate elements of the sustainable
development framework into the Iia regime, even if this integration remains in many respects embryonic. While the Iia regime could do more
to promote sustainable development, it is
unclear whether the Iia regime is the best institutional mechanism for addressing
wide-ranging and complex sustainable development issues.
In the short to medium term, the Iia regime will continue to evolve incrementally through developments in Iia jurisprudence and
treaty practice. This highlights the need for treaty drafters and interpreters to consider
fully the application and integration of the sustainable development framework.
Andrew Newcomb is Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Law of the University of Victoria,
Canada and a Research Fellow at the Centre for International Sustainable Development
Law.
Thomas J. Westcott: Recent Practice on Fair and Equitable Treatment
Recent investment arbitral awards interpreting the fair and equitable treatment standard demonstrate developments on two important issues. First, these cases cement as core elements of fair and equitable treatment an investor's legitimate expectations and the need for host states to provide a stable business environment. Second, recent awards have found no practical distinction between the fair and equitable treatment treaty standard and the modern-day minimum standard of treatment under customary international law. Whilst, prima facie, this convergence resolves confusion over whether fair and equitable treatment is a separate requirement, it remains ambiguous under what circumstances objective fairness principles may be applied.
Thomas J. Westcott is an international investment and trade consultant in Geneva,
Switzerland and was formerly a senior trade adviser in the Australian Prime
Minister's department and an investment treaty negotiator and policy adviser with the
Australian Treasury.
The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region of China, for the implementation of the International Convention on the Elimination
of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, published the Race Discrimination Bill in late
2006. Yet, the Bill has excluded the newly arrived Chinese from the mainland of China from
its application, although the Hong Kong Government admits the existence of discrimination
against such Chinese. For that, the Bill has violated the Basic Law of Hong Kong,
which guarantees the equal rights of those living in the territory. The Bill is also
in violation of customary international law in general and the UN International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights in particular, as well as the spirit of law of any society
governed by the rule of law.
Guiguo Wang, LL.M. of Columbia University Law School and Jsd of Yale Law School, is Professor (Chair) of Chinese and
Comparative Law at City University of Hong Kong and Chairman of the Hong Kong Wto Research Insitute.
Georgios I. Zekos: The Case for giving to Private Parties Access
to the Wto Dispute Settlement System
Awards deriving from the Dispute
Settlement Body are considered to be mere recommendations. The Wto
political body becomes the source of the award and takes that decision by adopting a panel
or Appellate Body report. Wto adjudication
influences all the members all the way through their participation in the monitoring of
execution, and bilateral adjudication should be subject to multilateral inspection or
recognition before being enforceable erga omnes. The character of the Wto itself is intergovernmental, regardless that
disputes often relate to particular industries or even single companies and that they are
carried out by States in their interest, if not officially on their behalf. There is a
need for a reform to admit claims by private
parties.
Georgios I. Zekos, BSc (Econ) (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), JD (Democritos
University of Thrace), Llm (University of Hull), and PhD (University of Hull), is an
Attorney at law and Economist in Greece.